In re GHP Nail Systems, LLC d/b/a Haute Polish Appeal from 234th District Court of Harris County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Amended Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Substituted Memorandum Opinion filed May 11, 2017. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00323-CV IN RE GHP NAIL SYSTEMS, LLC D/B/A HAUTE POLISH, Relator ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 234th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2016-19641 SUBSTITUED MEMORANDUM OPINION On May 2, 2017, we issued a memorandum opinion denying relator GHP Nail Systems, LLC d/b/a Haute Polish’s petition for writ of mandamus because the petition did not comply with certain Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Shortly thereafter, relator filed an amended petition for writ of mandamus that largely cured relator’s non-compliance. On our own initiative, we withdraw our previous memorandum opinion of May 2, 2017, and issue this substituted memorandum opinion in its place. In the amended petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Wesley Ward, presiding judge of the 234th District Court of Harris County, to vacate his March 14, 2017 Protective Order and sign the Protective Order proposed by relator. Generally, to obtain mandamus relief, a relator must show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Because relator has not established that it is entitled to mandamus relief, we deny relator’s amended petition for writ of mandamus. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Busby, and Jewell. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
