Ashley Wilkerson v. Elizabeth Arrington, M.D., Rakel Beall, M.D. and Mollie Gordon, M.D. Appeal from 295th District Court of Harris County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Motions denied as moot; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 25, 2017. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-16-00423-CV ASHLEY WILKERSON, Appellant V. ELIZABETH ARRINGTON, M.D., RAKEL BEALL, M.D. AND MOLLIE GORDON, M.D., Appellees On Appeal from the 295th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2015-66027 MEMORANDUM OPINION This is an attempted appeal from orders signed May 16, 2016. Generally, appeals may be taken only from final judgments. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). When orders do not dispose of all pending parties and claims, the orders remain interlocutory and unappealable until final judgment is rendered unless a statutory exception applies. Bally Total Fitness Corp. v. Jackson, 53 S.W.3d 352, 352 (Tex. 2001); Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps, 842 S.W.2d 266, 272 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). On March 28, 2017, notification was transmitted to the parties of this court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction unless appellant filed a response demonstrating grounds for continuing the appeal on or before April 12, 2017. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). No response has been filed. The appeal is ordered dismissed. Appellant’s pending motions for extension of time to file her brief are moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Donovan and Wise. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
