Brian Keith Williams v. The State of Texas Appeal from 178th District Court of Harris County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 26, 2016. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-16-00443-CR BRIAN KEITH WILLIAMS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 178th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1340190 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant was indicted for engaging in criminal activity. Pursuant to a charge bargain, the State agreed to reduce the charge to fraudulent use or possession of identifying information, more than 10 pieces and fewer than 50 pieces, in exchange for appellant’s guilty plea to that offense. The trial court sentenced appellant to eight years’ imprisonment. Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal. Because this is a charge-bargain case, appellant has the right to appeal under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(a)(2) only: (A) those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or (B) after receiving the trial court’s permission to appeal. Kennedy v. State, 297 S.W.3d 338, 340–41 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); see also Shankle v. State, 119 S.W.3d 808, 812–13 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003) (holding that charge bargain that “effectively puts a cap on punishment” is a bargain governed by rule of appellate procedure 25.2(a)(2)). The record does not reflect the trial court’s permission to appeal or any pretrial motions that could be appealed. Therefore, we lack jurisdiction of appellant’s appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Christopher, and Jamison. Do Not Publish — TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
