In Re Johnny Q. Clawson, Jr.--Appeal from 333rd District Court of Harris County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed September 8, 2011. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________ NO. 14-11-00723-CV ____________ IN RE JOHNNY Q. CLAWSON, JR., Relator ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 333rd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2009-59608 MEMORANDUM OPINION On August 24, 2011, relator, Johnny Q. Clawson, a pro se inmate, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov t Code ยง 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. Relator complains that respondent, the Honorable Joseph J. Tad Halbach, Jr., presiding judge of the 333rd District Court of Harris County, has not ruled on the contest to his pauper s affidavit. He asserts that he is indigent and unable to pay the costs required to prosecute his appeal. Relator s appeal is pending under this court s appellate case number 14-11-00532-CV, styled Johnny Q. Clawson v. Crosby Independent School District. On August 8, 2011, the Harris County District Clerk advised this court that the trial court has denied relator s request to proceed as a pauper. Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will issue only if (1) the trial court clearly abused its discretion and (2) the party requesting mandamus relief has no adequate remedy by appeal. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135 36 (Tex. 2004). The Texas Supreme Court has determined that, under the amended rules of appellate procedure, an indigent party may obtain the record pertaining to the trial court's ruling sustaining the contest to his affidavit of indigence and challenge that ruling as part of his appeal, and mandamus is not the appropriate remedy. See In re Arroyo, 988 S.W.2d 737, 738-39 (Tex. 1998). Therefore, relator has an adequate remedy through his pending appeal. Accordingly, we deny relator s petition for writ of mandamus. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Anderson and Christopher. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
