Tondee, Annastasia Leigh v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 185th District Court of Harris County

Annotate this Case
Affirmed and Opinion filed October 23, 2003

Affirmed and Opinion filed October 23, 2003.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-03-00563-CR

____________

ANNASTASIA LEIGH TONDEE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 185th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 894,691

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant entered a plea of no contest to the offense of injury to a child and on September 12, 2002, the trial court entered an order deferring adjudication and placing appellant on 10 years of community supervision. On Octob29, 2002, the State filed a motion to adjudicate. On April 4, 2003, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for 25 years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal.


Appellant=s appointed counsel filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).

A copy of counsel=s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). As of this date, no pro se response has been filed.

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel=s brief and agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the record. A discussion of the brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the state.

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Opinion filed October 23, 2003.

Panel consists of Justices Yates, Hudson, and Fowler.

Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.