In re Joey Wood Appeal from 458th District Court of Fort Bend County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Opinion issued June 30, 2022 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00429-CR NO. 01-22-00431-CR ——————————— IN RE JOEY WOOD, Relator Original Proceeding on Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator, Joey Wood, appearing pro se, has filed a “Pretrial Writ of Habeas Corpus for Bond Reduction” with this Court related to each of his two trial court cases.1 Wood’s habeas applications state that he has been indicted for the offenses 1 The underlying cases are The State of Texas v. Joey Wood, Cause Nos. 22-DCR-098418, 22-DCR-099345, in the 458th District Court of Fort Bend County, Texas, the Honorable Robert Rolnick presiding. of “agg[ravated] robbery with bail set at $150,000.00,” and “for obstruction or retaliation.” According to Wood, he was “arrested on February 3, 2022” and has been “illegally confined and restrained of his liberty” in the Fort Bend County detention facility since that time. Wood states that he “can prove his innocence once his bail is lower” and requests that this Court “grant this [application] for pretrial habeas corpus” and “issue a reasonable bail and grant a bond reduction hearing.” We dismiss Wood’s applications for writ of habeas corpus for lack of jurisdiction. An intermediate court of appeals does not have original habeas jurisdiction in criminal law matters. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(d) (original habeas jurisdiction of courts of appeals is limited to cases in which person’s liberty is restrained because person violated order, judgment, or decree entered in civil case); Chavez v. State, 132 S.W.3d 509, 510 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, no pet.). Our habeas corpus jurisdiction in criminal matters is appellate only. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(d); Ex parte Denby, 627 S.W.2d 435, 435 (Tex. App.— Houston [1st Dist.] 1981, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, in criminal habeas matters, this Court is limited to reviewing a trial court’s order denying a defendant’s pretrial application for writ of habeas corpus. See Montalvo v. State, 315 S.W.3d 588, 589 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2010, no pet.) (reviewing trial court’s order denying pretrial application writ of habeas corpus seeking reduction of bail). 2 Original habeas jurisdiction in criminal proceedings is limited to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, the district courts, and the county courts. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.05; see also Ex parte Werne, 118 S.W.3d 833, 836 n.1 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2003, no pet.) (noting Texas law permits “someone who is incarcerated to file a pretrial application of writ of habeas corpus” in trial court). For these reasons, to the extent that Wood seeks to have this Court to grant his applications for writ of habeas corpus, we lack jurisdiction to do so. Accordingly, we dismiss Wood’s applications for writ of habeas corpus for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are dismissed as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Landau, Guerra, and Farris. Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
