Claudia Forsterling v. Presidio at Clear Lake Appeal from Co Civil Ct at Law No 3 of Harris County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Opinion issued July 26, 2016 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-16-00269-CV ——————————— CLAUDIA FORSTERLING, Appellant V. PRESIDIO AT CLEAR LAKE, Appellee On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 3 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1074099 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Claudia Forsterling, proceeding pro se, has neither paid the required filing fee nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a), 101.041(1) (West Supp. 2015), § 101.0411 (West Supp. 2015); Order, Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). Further, appellant has neither paid nor made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). After being notified by the Clerk of this Court on April 25, 2016, and again on June 9, 2016, that this appeal was subject to dismissal for failure to pay the required fees, appellant did not timely respond. See id. 5, 37.3(b), 42.3(c). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c). PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Higley, Bland, and Massengale. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.