Martha Barron v. Fernando Barron Appeal from 312th District Court of Harris County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Opinion issued August 2, 2016 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-16-00175-CV ——————————— MARTHA BARRON, Appellant V. FERNANDO BARRON, Appellee On Appeal from the 312th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2012-27372 MEMORANDUM OPINION Martha Barron has neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West Supp. 2015); Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule); 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case). We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We dismiss any pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Brown, and Huddle. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.