Matthew Tanner v. Crossroads ROW Group and Jose Estefes Appeal from 401st Judicial District Court of Collin County (memorandum opinion)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISMISS and Opinion Filed November 1, 2022 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00756-CV MATTHEW TANNER, Appellant V. CROSSROADS ROW GROUP AND JOSE ESTEFES, Appellees On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 401-01527-2022 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Molberg, and Justice Goldstein Opinion by Chief Justice Burns The filing fee and docketing statement in this case are overdue. By postcards dated August 3, 2022 and September 29, 2022, we notified appellant the $205 filing fee was due.1 We directed appellant to remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in dismissal of the appeal. Also by postcard dated August 3, 2022, we informed appellant the docketing statement in this case was due. We cautioned appellant that failure to file the docketing statement within ten days might result in the dismissal of this appeal 1 The appeal information sheet indicates appellant is not entitled to proceed without payment of costs. without further notice. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee, filed the docketing statement, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c). /Robert D. Burns, III/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE 220756F.P05 –2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT MATTHEW TANNER, Appellant No. 05-22-00756-CV On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 401-015272022. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns. Justices Molberg and Goldstein participating. V. CROSSROADS ROW GROUP AND JOSE ESTEFES, Appellees In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. Judgment entered November 1, 2022 –3–

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.