Craig S. Pittman and Kelly Koncak Pittman v. Federal National Mortgage Assoc. Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2 of Dallas County (memorandum opinion)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Dismissed and Opinion Filed October 6, 2022 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00379-CV CRAIG S. PITTMAN AND KELLY KONCAK PITTMAN, Appellants V. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOC., Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-19-07067-B MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Myers, Pedersen, III, and Garcia Opinion by Justice Pedersen, III The clerk’s record in this case is overdue. On August 12, 2022, we sent a letter informing appellants the clerk’s record had not been filed because appellants had not paid for the clerk’s record. We directed appellants to provide, within ten days, verification they had either paid for or made arrangements to pay for the record or were entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellants that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, appellants have not provided the required documentation, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c). 220379f.p05 /Bill Pedersen, III/ BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE –2– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT CRAIG S. PITTMAN AND KELLY KONCAK PITTMAN, Appellants No. 05-22-00379-CV On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-19-07067B. Opinion delivered by Justice Pedersen, III. Justices Myers and Garcia participating. V. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOC., Appellee In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. It is ORDERED that appellee FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOC. recover its costs of this appeal from appellants CRAIG S. PITTMAN AND KELLY KONCAK PITTMAN. Judgment entered this 6th day of October, 2022. –3–

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.