In the Interest Of J.S.S., A Child Appeal from 429th Judicial District Court of Collin County (memorandum opinion)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Dismiss and Opinion Filed July 19, 2022 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00217-CV IN THE INTEREST OF J.S.S., A CHILD On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 429-55770-2020 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Molberg, Reichek, and Garcia Opinion by Justice Molberg It is well-settled that an appeal can only be taken from a signed final judgment that disposes of all parties and claims or signed interlocutory orders as authorized by statute. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1; Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps, 842 S.W.2d 266, 272 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Because the challenged actions in this appeal— (1) the trial court’s non-memorialized ruling on appellee’s motion for sanctions and enforcement of final order in suit affecting parent-child relationship and (2) the district clerk’s rejection of two documents appellant submitted electronically to be filed1—did not appear to be either, we questioned our jurisdiction over the appeal. 1 The documents, a new trial motion and request for leave to file bill of review, were rejected because attached to each were proposed orders that needed to be filed “in their own separate envelope.” In a letter brief filed at our direction, appellant does not dispute the challenged actions are not appealable but asks that we exercise jurisdiction “for the protection of the true matter of this case J.S.S.” or, alternatively, that we consider the appeal a petition for writ of mandamus. We decline to consider the appeal as a mandamus petition and, although this state has a long-standing policy of protecting children’s interests, see Williams v. Patton, 821 S.W.2d 141, 145 (Tex. 1991), we cannot exercise appellate jurisdiction without a final judgment or appealable interlocutory order, Tipps, 842 S.W.2d at 272. Accordingly, because the challenged actions are not appealable, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). 220217f.p05 /Ken Molberg// KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE –2– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT IN THE INTEREST OF J.S.S., A CHILD On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 429-557702020. Opinion delivered by Justice Molberg, Justices Reichek and Garcia participating. No. 05-22-00217-CV In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal. Judgment entered this 19th day of July, 2022. –3–

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.