In Re Thresher and Thresher Appeal from 44th Judicial District Court of Dallas County (memorandum opinion)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

DENY and Opinion Filed September 22, 2021 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00410-CV IN RE THRESHER AND THRESHER, Relators Original Proceeding from the 44th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-05644 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Schenck, Nowell, and Garcia Opinion by Justice Schenck In this original proceeding, relators ask us to compel the trial court to vacate its order striking their expert witness. Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relators to show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that they lack an adequate remedy by appeal. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on our review of the petition and record, we conclude that relators have not shown they lack an adequate remedy. See In re Flores, No. 05-19-01058-CV, 2020 WL 2847531, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas June 2, 2020, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (denying mandamus relief for orders striking experts because relators had adequate remedy by appeal). Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. /David J. Schenck/ DAVID J. SCHENCK JUSTICE 210410F.P05 –2–

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.