Scott Fields v. City of Sherman, Texas, David Plyler, Zach Flores, and Alex Shivers Appeal from 59th Judicial District Court of Grayson County (memorandum opinion)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed March 19, 2019. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-01385-CV SCOTT FIELDS, Appellant V. CITY OF SHERMAN, TEXAS, DAVID PLYLER, ZACH FLORES, AND ALEX SHIVERS, Appellees On Appeal from the 59th Judicial District Court Grayson County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CV-18-1686 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Brown, Schenck, and Pedersen, III Opinion by Justice Schenck This is an appeal from the denial of a temporary restraining order. Because an order denying a motion for a temporary restraining order is not appealable, we directed appellant to file a letter brief addressing the Court’s jurisdiction. See Nikolouzos v. St. Luke’s Episcopal Hosp., 162 S.W.3d 678, 680-81 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2005, no pet.) (en banc) (noting that appellate courts have jurisdiction to consider immediate appeals of interlocutory orders that do not dispose of all issues and parties only if allowed by statute and no statute authorizes appeal from denial of temporary restraining order). Appellant complied, but nothing in his letter demonstrates we have jurisdiction. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a); Nikolouzos, 162 S.W.3d at 681. /David J. Schenck/ DAVID J. SCHENCK JUSTICE 181385F.P05 –2– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT SCOTT FIELDS, Appellant No. 05-18-01385-CV On Appeal from the 59th Judicial District Court, Grayson County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CV-18-1686. Opinion delivered by Justice Schenck, Justices Brown and Pedersen, III participating. V. CITY OF SHERMAN, TEXAS, DAVID PLYLER, ZACH FLORES, AND ALEX SHIVERS, Appellees In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal. Judgment entered this 19th day of March 2019. –3–

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.