Sabrina Coleman v. Dallas Housing Authority Appeal from County Court at Law No. 5 of Dallas County (memorandum opinion)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DISMISS and Opinion Filed November 28, 2018 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00114-CV SABRINA COLEMAN, Appellant V. DALLAS HOUSING AUTHORITY, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-17-06577-E MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Brown, and Whitehill Opinion by Justice Whitehill Appellant’s brief is overdue. On May 24, 2018, after appellant failed to respond to our inquiry regarding the reporter’s record, we ordered the appeal submitted without a reporter’s record and appellant’s brief to be filed within thirty days. By postcard dated June 27, 2018, we notified appellant the time for filing her brief had expired. We directed appellant to file a brief and an extension motion within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to file a brief and an extension motion would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not filed a brief, filed an extension motion, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b), (c). /Bill Whitehill/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE 180114F.P05 –2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT SABRINA COLEMAN, Appellant No. 05-18-00114-CV On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-17-06577-E. Opinion delivered by Justice Whitehill. Justices Bridges and Brown participating. V. DALLAS HOUSING AUTHORITY, Appellee In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. It is ORDERED that appellee DALLAS HOUSING AUTHORITY recover its costs of this appeal from appellant SABRINA COLEMAN. Judgment entered November 28, 2018. –3–

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.