Daniel Hightower v. Taylor Hightower Appeal from 256th Judicial District Court of Dallas County (memorandum opinion)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Dismissed and Opinion Filed December 29, 2017 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-00997-CV DANIEL HIGHTOWER, Appellant V. TAYLOR HIGHTOWER, Appellee On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-13-02592 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Lang, Brown, and Whitehill Opinion by Justice Whitehill The filing fee and docketing statement in this case are past due. By postcard dated August 24, 2017, we notified appellant the $205 filing fee was due. We directed appellant to remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in dismissal of the appeal. Also by postcard dated August 24, 2017, we informed appellant the docketing statement in this case was past due. We cautioned appellant that failure to file the docketing statement within ten days might result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee, filed the docketing statement, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. We dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c). /Bill Whitehill/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE 170997F.P05 –2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT DANIEL HIGHTOWER, Appellant No. 05-17-00997-CV On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-13-02592. Opinion delivered by Justice Whitehill. Justices Lang and Brown participating. V. TAYLOR HIGHTOWER, Appellee In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution. It is ORDERED that appellee Taylor Hightower recover their costs of this appeal from appellant Daniel Hightower. Judgment entered December 29, 2017. –3–

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.