Ex Parte: Michelle Ranae Verner Appeal from 196th District Court of Hunt County (memorandum opinion )

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
VACATED AND REMANDED and Opinion Filed August 12, 2016. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-00866-CV EX PARTE: MICHELLE RANAE VERNER On Appeal from the 196th District Court Hunt County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 81378 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Bridges and Lang Opinion by Justice Lang This is a restricted appeal from the trial court’s order granting an expunction. Before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to reverse and render judgment. The parties state in their motion that they have agreed that appellee is not entitled to expunction of her records. Citing to rule of appellate procedure 42.1(a)(2)(A), they ask that we reverse the trial court’s judgment in its entirety and render judgment in favor of appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A). The parties’ pleadings and the trial court’s judgment are not before this Court because the clerk’s record has not been filed. Without reviewing these documents, this Court will not render judgment. For this reason, we grant the parties’ joint motion TO THE EXTENT that we vacate the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits and remand this case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement. 42.1(a)(2)(B). 160866F.P05 /Douglas S. Lang/ DOUGLAS S. LANG JUSTICE See TEX. R. APP. P. Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT EX PARTE: MICHELLE RANAE VERNER On Appeal from the 196th District Court, Hunt County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 81378. Opinion delivered by Justice Lang. Chief Justice Wright and Justice Bridges participating. No. 05-16-00866-CV In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is VACATED without regard to the merits and this case is REMANDED to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement. It is ORDERED that the parties bear their own costs of the appeal. Judgment entered this 12th day of August, 2016. –2–

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.