MARY MATHIS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Annotate this CaseDISMISS; Opinion issued August 8, 2008
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
............................
No. 05-08-00970-CR
No. 05-08-00971-CR
............................
MARY MATHIS, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
.............................................................
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause Nos. F02-22877-K, F03-23495-K
.............................................................
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Morris, Whittington, and O'Neill
Mary Mathis appealed the trial court's order denying her motion to recuse. An order denying a motion to recuse is not an appealable interlocutory order. See Footnote 1 See generally Ex parte Apolinar, 820 S.W.2d 792, 794 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Wright v. State, 969 S.W.2d 588, 589 (Tex. App.-Dallas 1998, no pet.). We dismiss the appeals for want of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM
Do Not Publish
Tex. R. App. P. 47
080970F.U05
Footnote 1 Appellant has appeals from the judgments of conviction in the above trial court numbers pending as cause nos. 05-08-00869-CR and 05-08- 00870-CR. Those appeals have been abated for findings regarding the record. It appears appellant's motion to recuse may be related to the abatement order.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.