IN THE INTERESTS OF Z.E., A CHILD

Annotate this Case

DISMISS and Opinion Filed September 27, 2007
 
 
 
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
............................
No. 05-07-00709-CV
............................
IN THE INTERESTS OF Z.E., A CHILD
 
.............................................................
On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court
                                        Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DF98-00424-Z
.............................................................
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Morris, Bridges, and O'Neill
 
        On June 8, 2007, appellant filed a notice of appeal in this case indicating he was appealing an order of the trial court dated June 6, 2007. The June 6, 2007 order of the trial court is an order to appear for a hearing. By letter dated August 22, 2007, we directed appellant to file a letter brief regarding this Court's jurisdiction by September 5, 2007. Appellant did not file a jurisdictional brief.
        Appellate courts have jurisdiction over final judgments and such interlocutory orders as the legislature deems appealable. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001); Ruiz v. Ruiz, 946 S.W.2d 123, 124 (Tex.App.-El Paso 1997, no writ). An order to appear for a hearing is not an appealable interlocutory order. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 15.064(a) (Vernon 2002).         Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.
 
                                                                  PER CURIAM        
        
070709F.P05
 
 

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.