VERNELL LA FALL SHEFFIELD, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Affirmed and Opinion Filed November 21, 1989
 
 
S
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
............................
No. 05-89-00514-CR
............................
VERNELL LA FALL SHEFFIELD, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
 
.................................................................
On Appeal from Criminal District Court No. 5
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. F86-90526-VL
.................................................................
OPINION PER CURIAM
Before Justices Howell, Baker, and Burnett
        Vernell La Fall Sheffield appeals his conviction for aggravated robbery. Punishment was assessed at forty five years confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections.
        Appellant's attorney has filed a brief in which appellant's attorney has concluded that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). A copy of counsel's brief has been delivered to appellant and appellant has been advised that he would be given the opportunity to examine the appellate record and that he had a right to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.
        We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.
        The judgment is affirmed.
 
                                                          PER CURIAM
 
Do Not Publish
Tex. R. App. P. 90
 
890514.U05
 
 
File Date[11-21-89]
File Name[890514]