Paul Torres v. The State of Texas Appeal from 106th District Court of Gaines County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Opinion filed January 10, 2019 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals ___________ No. 11-18-00330-CR ___________ PAUL TORRES, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 106th District Court Gaines County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 10-4100 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Paul Torres, has filed an untimely notice of appeal in this cause. Appellant attempts to appeal from an order denying his motion for forensic DNA testing. We dismiss the appeal. The documents on file in this case indicate that the order was signed on September 10, 2018, and that the notice of appeal was filed in the district clerk’s office on November 26, 2018. Appellant’s notice of appeal was due to be filed within thirty days after the date that the trial court entered the order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1); see also TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 64.05 (West 2018). A notice of appeal must be in writing and filed with the clerk of the trial court. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(c)(1). The documents on file in this court reflect that Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed seventy-seven days after the order was entered. The notice of appeal was, therefore, untimely. Absent a timely filed notice of appeal or the granting of a timely motion for extension of time, we do not have jurisdiction to entertain this appeal. See Swearingen v. State, 189 S.W.3d 779, 781 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006); see also Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522–23 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Rodarte v. State, 860 S.W.2d 108, 110 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993). When the appeal was filed in this court, we notified Appellant by letter that the notice of appeal appeared to be untimely and that the appeal may be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. We requested that Appellant respond to our letter and show grounds to continue. Appellant filed a response but has not shown any grounds upon which this appeal may proceed. We dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. PER CURIAM January 10, 2019 Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Willson, J., and Wright, S.C.J.1 Willson, J., not participating. 1 Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Eastland, sitting by assignment. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
