Mawiyah Reece v. Housing Authority of the City of Austin Appeal from County Court at Law No 1 of Travis County (memorandum opinion)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS MAWIYAH REESE, § Appellant, v. § HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF AUSTIN-PATHWAYS ASSET MANAGEMENT, § Appellee. No. 08-22-00137-CV § § § Appeal from the County Court at Law #2 of Travis County, Texas (TC# C-1-CV-22-001293) MEMORANDUM OPINION This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to determine whether it should be dismissed for want of prosecution. 1 Finding Appellant, Mawiyah Reese, has not filed an Appellant’s Brief or filed a motion for extension of time to file a brief, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. A final judgment was signed on May 31, 2022. Appellant filed a notice of appeal on June 23, 2022. The Clerk’s Record was filed on July 8, 2002. Our record shows that no request 1 We hear this case on transfer from the Third Court of Appeals. See TEX.R.APP.P. 41.3. 1 was made for a Reporter’s Record. On July 19, 2022, the appeal was transferred by order of the Texas Supreme Court from the Third Court of Appeals to this Court. On August 17, 2022, the Clerk of this Court sent Appellant a letter indicating that it appeared Appellant no longer wished to pursue this appeal, as neither an Appellant’s Brief, nor a motion for extension of time had been filed. The letter indicated that the Court would submit this case for dismissal within 10 days unless any party could show grounds for continuing the appeal. As of this date, Appellant has not filed an Appellant’s Brief or a motion for extension of time to file a brief, nor has a response been received to the correspondence sent by the Court. Pursuant to Rule 42.3(b) and (c), we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX.R.APP.P. 42.3(b), (c). JEFF ALLEY, Justice August 31, 2022 Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.