Towner Leeper v. R. F. Haynsworth and Gary Crossland--Appeal from 346th District Court of El Paso County

Annotate this Case
Becker v. State /**/

COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

 

)

TOWNER LEEPER, ) No. 08-04-00299-CV

)

Appellant, ) Appeal from

)

v. ) 346th District Court

)

R.F. HAYNSWORTH and ) of El Paso County, Texas

GARY CROSSLAND, )

) (TC# 2000-1541)

Appellees. )

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

Pending before the Court is a motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction filed by R.F. Haynsworth and Gary Crossland. Towner Leeper attempts to appeal from an order granting partial summary judgment. In his response to the motion, Leeper admits that the summary judgment is interlocutory and asks the Court to disregard his notice of appeal. We have filed Leeper s response as a voluntary motion to dismiss pursuant to Tex.R.App.P. 42.1.

Appellate courts generally have jurisdiction over final judgments and such interlocutory orders as the legislature deems appealable. Tex.Civ.Prac.&Rem.Code Ann. 51.012 (Vernon 1997) and 51.014 (Vernon Supp. 2004-05); Ruiz v. Ruiz, 946 S.W.2d 123, 124 (Tex.App.--El Paso 1997, no writ). The partial summary judgment is not a final judgment and is not an appealable order under Section 51.014. Accordingly, we grant the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Leeper s voluntary motion to dismiss is denied as moot.

 

January 13, 2005

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Justice

 

Before Panel No. 2

Barajas, C.J., McClure, and Chew, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.