Gabino Gallegos Gamino, Jr. v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 409th District Court of El Paso County

Annotate this Case
Becker v. State /**/

COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

 

)

GABINO GALLEGOS GAMINO, JR., ) No. 08-04-00150-CR

)

Appellant, ) Appeal from

)

v. ) 409th District Court

)

THE STATE OF TEXAS, ) of El Paso County, Texas

)

Appellee. ) (TC# 20030D04686)

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

Gabino Gallegos Gamino, Jr. attempts to appeal his conviction for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. Finding that Appellant has not timely filed his notice of appeal or a motion for extension of time, we dismiss the appeal.

The record before us reflects that sentence was imposed in open court on May 12, 2004. Appellant did not file a motion for new trial. He filed notice of appeal on June 18, 2004. By letter dated June 24, 2004, we notified in Appellant in writing of our intent to dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke this Court s jurisdiction. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996). Appellant s notice of appeal was due to be filed on June 11, 2004, thirty days after the day sentence was imposed in open court. See Tex.R.App.P. 26.2(a)(1). Pursuant to Rule 26.3, a court of appeals may grant an extension of time to file notice of appeal if the notice is filed within fifteen days after the last day allowed and, within the same period, a motion is filed in the court of appeals reasonably explaining the need for the extension of time. Tex.R.App.P. 26.3; Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522. Because Appellant did not file his notice of appeal until June 18, 2004, and he failed to file a motion for extension of time, he failed to perfect this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

 

August 5, 2004

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Justice

 

Before Panel No. 2

Barajas, C.J., McClure, and Chew, JJ.

 

(Do Not Publish)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.