WHITE, MARQUIS OBRIAN Appeal from 291st District Court of Dallas County (other per curiam)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NOS. WR-83,982-01; WR-83,982-02; WR-83,982-03; WR-83,982-04 EX PARTE MARQUIS OBRIAN WHITE, Applicant ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NOS. F12-71367-U; F12-57100-U; F12-56960-U; F12-71366-U IN THE 291ST DISTRICT COURT FROM DALLAS COUNTY Per curiam. OPINION Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of sexual assault of a child in two cause numbers and aggravated sexual assault of a child in two cause numbers. He was sentenced to life imprisonment in each cause. The Fifth Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions. White v. State, Nos. 05-13-00264-CR; 05-13-00262-CR; 05-13-00261-CR; 05-13-00263-CR (Tex. App.—Dallas Jan. 7, 2015). Applicant contends that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel 2 failed to timely notify Applicant that his convictions had been affirmed. Appellate counsel filed this application with the trial court. Based on counsel’s sworn allegations, the trial court has entered findings of fact and conclusions of law that appellate counsel failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed. The trial court recommends that relief be granted. Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file out-of-time petitions for discretionary review of the judgments of the Fifth Court of Appeals in Cause Nos. 05-13-00264CR; 05-13-00262-CR; 05-13-00261-CR; 05-13-00263-CR that affirmed his convictions in Cause Nos. F12-71367-U; F12-57100-U; F12-56960-U; F12-71366-U from the 291st District Court of Dallas County. Applicant shall file his petitions for discretionary review with this Court within 30 days of the date on which this Court’s mandate issues. Delivered: November 4, 2015 Do not publish

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.