DANIEL SCOTT JOHNSON, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS (Other)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-0355-14 DANIEL SCOTT JOHNSON, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS ON APPELLANT S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS LIMESTONE COUNTY Per curiam. Keasler and Hervey, JJ., dissent. ORDER Appellant has failed to file copies of his petition for discretionary review as required by Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.3(b)(2) and Order Requiring Copies (Court of Criminal Appeals Misc. Docket No. 13-004, December 16, 2013). The petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.4(j), because the petition does not contain a copy of the opinion of the court of appeals. The petition is struck. See Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.6. The petitioner may redraw the petition. The redrawn petition and copies must be filed in the Court of Criminal Appeals within thirty days after the date of this order. Filed: May 7, 2014 Do Not Publish

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.