EX PARTE JERRY WILSON, AKA STEVE VIC PARKER, AKA VICTOR WATKINS, Applicant (Other)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-22,317-17 EX PARTE JERRY WILSON, AKA STEVE VIC PARKER, AKA VICTOR WATKINS, Applicant ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. FR 39082-L IN THE 264TH DISTRICT COURT FROM BELL COUNTY Per curiam. ORDER Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleaded guilty to unauthorized use of a motor vehicle, and was sentenced to twenty years imprisonment. On October 13, 2010, Applicant received two seven-year sentences for offenses committed while he was out on mandatory supervision. The seven-year sentences were ordered to run consecutively with his twenty-year sentence in this case. Applicant contends that his twenty-year sentence in this case is being improperly extended, because the two seven-year sentences have been included on his 2013 Certificate of Mandatory Supervision. It is not clear how the inclusion of the two seven-year cause numbers on the Certificate of Mandatory Supervision could cause his twenty-year sentence to be extended. However, the documents in the habeas record, including an affidavit from TDCJ prepared in January of 2012, do not provide a comprehensive picture of how Applicant s sentences are being calculated. In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order the Texas Department of Criminal Justice s Office of the General Counsel to file an affidavit updating Applicant s history of release and revocation since the January, 2012 affidavit. The affidavit shall state whether Applicant was approved for parole release on this twenty-year sentence before the Certificate of Mandatory Supervision was issued on April 11, 2013. If Applicant was approved for parole release on this sentence, the affidavit shall state the date of such approval, and the date upon which the twenty-year sentence ceased to operate. The affidavit shall state whether Applicant was actually released to mandatory supervision pursuant to the April, 2013 Certificate, and if so, the date upon which he was released. The affidavit shall state whether Applicant s mandatory supervision was subsequently revoked, and if so, when. The affidavit shall state whether or not Applicant is receiving credit for any of the time spent on mandatory supervision. Finally, the affidavit should indicate whether or not Applicant has submitted his claim to the time credit resolution system of TDCJ, and if so, the date when the claim was submitted. The trial court may also order depositions, interrogatories or a hearing. In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id. If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . C ODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant has properly exhausted his administrative remedies as required by TEX . GOV T CODE ยง 501.0081(b)(c). The trial court shall also make findings and conclusions as to whether Applicant is receiving the proper amount of time credit for any time he spent on mandatory supervision, and as to whether the remainder of Applicant s twenty-year and seven-year sentences are being calculated concurrently, or consecutively. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant s claim for habeas corpus relief. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter s notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court. Filed: September 11, 2013 Do not publish
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
