EX PARTE MICHAEL SHANNON COTY, Applicant (Other)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-78,709-01 EX PARTE MICHAEL SHANNON COTY, Applicant ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 8708 IN THE 344TH DISTRICT COURT FROM CHAMBERS COUNTY Per curiam. ORDER Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle and sentenced to twenty-five years imprisonment. Applicant contends that he is being denied credit for time served in Madison County Indiana pursuant to a warrant to revoke his parole in this cause. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. 2 The trial court shall order the Texas Department of Criminal Justice s Office of the General Counsel to file an affidavit listing Applicant s sentence begin date and the dates of issuance of any parole-revocation warrants leading to the revocation of such parole or mandatory supervision. The affidavit should state when such warrants were executed and the dates Applicant was in custody pursuant to those warrants. The affidavit should state whether any detainers were placed on Applicant when he was in the custody of Indiana authorities, and if so, the dates of those detainers. The affidavit should state whether or not Applicant is receiving credit for any of the time spent on parole. Finally, the affidavit should indicate whether or not Applicant has submitted his claim to the time credit resolution system of TDCJ, and if so, the date when the claim was submitted. The trial court may also order depositions, interrogatories or a hearing. If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . C ODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant has properly exhausted his administrative remedies as required by TEX . GOV T CODE ยง 501.0081(b)(c). The trial court shall then make findings and conclusions as to whether Applicant is receiving the proper amount of time credit for any time spent in custody while on parole. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant s claim for habeas corpus relief. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter s notes from any hearing or 3 deposition, along with the trial court s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court. Filed: December 19, 2012 Do not publish
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
