EX PARTE LESLIE MEGAN LEWIS-GRANT, Applicant (Other)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. AP-76,886 EX PARTE LESLIE MEGAN LEWIS-GRANT, Applicant ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. FCM-07-19103 IN THE 52nd DISTRICT COURT FROM CORYELL COUNTY Per curiam. OPINION Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. The Fourteenth Court of Appeals affirmed her conviction. LewisGrant v. State, 14-09-00069-CR (Tex. App. Houston[14th Dist.], delivered August 31, 2010, no pet.). Applicant contends that her appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel mistakenly filed his motion for rehearing under the wrong cause number, thus causing her to miss the pertinent deadline for filing a timely petition for discretionary review in this case. 2 Appellate counsel filed this application on behalf of Applicant, and concedes that it was through counsel s oversight rather than through any fault of Applicant s that no petition was timely filed. Furthermore, counsel states that he intended to file a petition for discretionary review in this case and that Applicant desired he file a petition. Therefore, based upon the record before this Court, we grant relief. Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionary review of the judgment of the Fourteenth Court of Appeals in Cause No. 14-0900069-CR that affirmed her conviction in Cause No. FCM-07-19103 from the 52nd District Court of Coryell County. Applicant shall file her petition for discretionary review with this Court within 30 days of the date on which this Court s mandate issues. Delivered: October 3, 2012 Do not publish

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.