EX PARTE JEFFERY BRUCE SEEGER, Applicant (Other)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-47,098-02 EX PARTE JEFFERY BRUCE SEEGER, Applicant ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 007-1421-08-A IN THE 7th DISTRICT COURT FROM SMITH COUNTY Per curiam. ORDER Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of indecency with a child and sentenced to ninety-nine years imprisonment. The Twelfth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Seeger v. State, No. 12-09-00145-CR (Tex. App. Tyler July 30, 2010)(unpublished). Applicant contends that he is entitled to an out-of-time petition for discretionary review (PDR) based on fraud. He alleges that a non-lawyer, Natalie Ellis, deceived his mother into paying her in order to have an attorney in Austin represent Applicant for his PDR. 2 Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Ex parte Riley, 193 S.W.3d 900 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall hold a live hearing to hear testimony from both Applicant s mother and Natalie Ellis to determine whether Applicant s right to file a PDR was affected by fraud or deceit. It appears that Applicant is represented by counsel. The trial court shall determine if Applicant is represented by counsel, and if not, whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. The trial court shall make findings of fact as to whether Applicant s right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review was obstructed as a result of fraudulent actions on the part of Natalie Ellis. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant s claim for habeas corpus relief. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter s notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court. 3 Filed: December 14, 2011 Do not publish
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
