State v. Otobhiale
Annotate this Case
The Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the circuit court convicting Defendant of aiding, abetting, or advising grand theft by deception, holding that the circuit court did not err or abuse its discretion in the proceedings below.
On appeal, Defendant argued that the circuit court's evidentiary rulings admitting other acts evidence under S.D. R. Evid. 404(b) or, in the alternative, as res gestate evidence was in error and that the court erroneously denied his motions for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence and for judgment of acquittal. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding that the circuit court (1) did not abuse its discretion when it denied Defendant's motion in limine; (2) did not abuse its discretion when it denied Defendant's motion for a new trial; and (3) did not err in denying Defendant's motion for judgment of acquittal.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.