State v. Odom

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court The State, Respondent, v. Maurice Anthony Odom, Petitioner. Appellate Case No. 2018-001676 ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS Appeal from Edgefield County R. Knox McMahon, Circuit Court Judge Memorandum Opinion No. 2020-MO-001 Heard December 11, 2019 – Filed January 22, 2020 CERTIORARI DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of Columbia, for Petitioner. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Attorney General David A. Spencer, both of Columbia; and Solicitor Samuel R. Hubbard III, of Lexington, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: We issued a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals' decision in State v. Odom, Op. No. 2018-UP-273 (S.C. Ct. App. filed June 27, 2018). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted. DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED. BEATTY, C.J., KITTREDGE, HEARN, FEW and JAMES, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.