MO-003 - Riemann v. Palmetto Gems
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Roger R. Riemann, Petitioner, v. Palmetto Gems & Gemological Services, Inc. and Thomas Shofner, in his individual capacity, Respondents. Appellate Case No. 2015-001100 ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS Appeal From Lexington County R. Knox McMahon, Circuit Court Judge Memorandum Opinion No. 2016-MO-003 Heard February 10, 2016 – Filed February 24, 2016 CERTIORARI DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED Eugene Hamilton Matthews, Sheila Marlouvon Bias and Carmen Vaughn Ganjehsani, all of Richardson Plowden & Robinson, P.A., of Columbia, for Petitioner. Angus H. Macaulay and James Andrew Byars, both of Nexsen Pruet, L.L.C., of Columbia, for Respondents. PER CURIAM: We granted Roger R. Riemann's petition for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Appeals in Riemann v. Palmetto Gems & Gemological Servs., Op. No. 2015-UP-107 (S.C. Ct. App. filed Mar. 4, 2015). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted. DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED. PLEICONES, C.J., BEATTY, KITTREDGE, HEARN, JJ., and Acting Justice Alison Renee Lee, concur.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
