Hall v. Rodriquez

Annotate this Case

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. 

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Supreme Court

Rachel Hall, Respondent,

v.

Angel Rodriquez, Petitioner.

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS

Appeal from Richland County
 Joseph M. Strickland, Master-in-Equity

Memorandum Opinion No. 2012-MO-011
Heard March 21, 2012 Filed April 25, 2012  

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED

James B. Richardson, Jr, and Steven R. Anderson, both of Columbia, for Petitioner.

William E. Booth, III, of West Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  We granted a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals' decision in Hall v. Rodriquez, Op. No. 2009-UP-564 (S.C. Ct. App. filed Nov. 30, 2009).  We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEATTY, KITTREDGE, JJ., and Acting Justice James E. Moore, concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.