Ruffin v. State
Annotate this CaseTHIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Supreme Court
Mikal J. Ruffin, Petitioner,
v.
State of South Carolina, Respondent.
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI
Appeal from Cherokee County
Roger L. Couch, Circuit Court Judge
Memorandum Opinion No. 2011-MO-018
Submitted May 25, 2011 Filed July 11, 2011
DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED
Raymond Elston MacKay, of Anderson, for Petitioner.
Attorney General Alan Wilson; Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh; Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott; and Assistant Attorney General Suzanne H. White, all of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: We granted a writ of certiorari to review the post-conviction relief court's order denying relief to Petitioner. After careful consideration of the appendix and briefs, the writ of certiorari is
DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.
TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEATTY, KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ., concur.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.