Brown v. Zamias

Annotate this Case

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Supreme Court

Mary B. Brown,        Petitioner,

v.

George D. Zamias, d/b/a Rock Hill Galleria,        Respondent.

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS

Appeal From York County
Paul E. Short, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Memorandum Opinion No. 2004-MO-010
Heard February 18, 2004 - Filed April 5, 2004

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED

Thomas E. Elliott, Jr., of the Elliott Law Firm, of Columbia, for Petitioners.

Kenneth Ray Raynor, of Templeton & Raynor, PA, of Charlotte, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  We granted a writ of certiorari to review the Court of Appeals' opinion in Brown v. Zamias, 2002-UP-715 (S.C. Ct. App. filed Nov. 15, 2002).  We dismiss the writ as improvidently granted. 

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

TOAL, C.J., MOORE, WALLER, PLEICONES, JJ., and Acting Justice J. Cordell Maddox, Jr., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.