Roaddepot, LLC and Keyserton, LLC, v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., C.A. (Amended)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS KENT, SC. SUPERIOR COURT (FILED: May 11, 2015) ROADEPOT, LLC and KEYSERTON, LLC, Plaintiffs : : : : : : : : v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., Defendant C.A. No. KC-2010-0540 AMENDED DECISION GALLO, J. This Amended Decision is being filed to correct the following: 1. The original Decision on page 7 stated the following: In light of the clear contractual language “defin[ing] the rights of the parties,” Home Depot has available to it a claim in restitution for the benefit it mistakenly conferred to Home Depot. 2. The Court amends page 7 as follows: In light of the clear contractual language “defin[ing] the rights of the parties,” Home Depot has available to it a claim in restitution for the benefit it mistakenly conferred on Roadepot. The remaining content of the Decision filed on May 4, 2015 remains the same. RHODE ISLAND SUPERIOR COURT Amended Decision Addendum Sheet TITLE OF CASE: Roadepot, LLC and Keyserton, LLC v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. CASE NO: KC-2010-0540 COURT: Kent County Superior Court DATE DECISION FILED: May 11, 2015 JUSTICE/MAGISTRATE: Gallo, J. ATTORNEYS: For Plaintiff: Mark. A Pogue, Esq. For Defendant: Jeffrey S. Brenner, Esq.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
