Chilutti, S. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. - No. (Granted) (petitions for allowance of appeal)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT SHANNON CHILUTTI AND KEITH CHILUTTI, H/W v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., GEGEN LLC, RAISER-PA, LLC, RAISER, LLC, SARAH'S CAR CARE, INC., MOHAMMED BASHEIR PETITION OF: UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., GEGAN LLC, RAISER-PA, LLC, RAISER, LLC : No. 257 EAL 2023 : : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court : : : : : : : : : : : ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 27th day of August, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioner, are: (1) Does the Superior Court’s new special-notice rule for enforcing online arbitration agreements violate the [Federal Arbitration Act], as interpreted and applied by the Supreme Court of the United States? (2) As a matter of Pennsylvania law, should online arbitration agreements be enforced under the same rules applicable to contracts generally? (3) Does the Superior Court lack appellate jurisdiction to immediately review interlocutory orders staying litigation pending arbitration? Justice McCaffery did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.