Gochin, D, Aplt. v. Judicial Conduct Board et al (per curiam order)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT DIANE R. GOCHIN, : : Appellant : : : v. : : : JUDICIAL CONDUCT BOARD BY AND : THROUGH ITS AGENTS AND CHIEF : COUNSELS; SUPREME COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA BY AND THROUGH ITS : TBN AGENTS AND EMPLOYEES; : PENNSYLVANIA SUPERIOR COURT : AND ITS PROTHONOTARY BY AND : THROUGH ITS TBN AGENTS AND : EMPLOYEES; PENNSYLVANIA COURT : OF COMMON PLEAS BY AND : THROUGH ITS TBN AGENTS; : MONTGOMERY COUNTY AND ITS : SHERIFF; OFFICE OF ATTORNEY : GENERAL BY AND THROUGH ITS TBN : AGENTS AND EMPLOYEES JOSH : SHAPIRO, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN : OFFICIAL CAPACITY JUDGE PAUL : DIAMOND, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN : OFFICIAL CAPACITY, JUDGE RICHARD : HAAZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN OFFICIAL : CAPACITY, KELLY WALL, : INDIVIDUALLY AND IN OFFICIAL : CAPACITY, GAIL WEILHEIMER, : INDIVIDUALLY AND IN OFFICIAL : CAPACITY THOMAS BRANCA, : INDIVIDUALLY AND IN OFFICIAL : CAPACITY ROBERT GRACI, : INDIVIDUALLY AND IN OFFICIAL : CAPACITY, MARY JANE BOWES, : INDIVIDUALLY AND IN OFFICIAL : CAPACITY KATE FORD ELLIOTT, : : No. 22 MAP 2019 Appeal from the Order of the Commonwealth Court at No. 14 MD 2018 dated January 14, 2019. INDIVIDUALLY AND IN OFFICIAL CAPACITY, : : : Appellees ORDER PER CURIAM DECIDED: October 31, 2019 AND NOW, this 31st day of October, 2019, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is hereby AFFIRMED. [22 MAP 2019] - 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
