Bailets v. PA Turnpike Com, et al; Ap of: Turnpike (per curiam order)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT RALPH M. BAILETS v. PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISSION, ANTHONY Q. MAUN, (DIRECTOR OF ACCOUNTING), AND NIKOLAUS H. GRIESHABER, (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER) APPEAL OF: PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISSION RALPH M. BAILETS v. PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISSION, ANTHONY Q. MAUN, (DIRECTOR OF ACCOUNTING), AND NIKOLAUS H. GRIESHABER, (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER) APPEAL OF: PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISSION : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : No. 126 MAP 2016 : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : No. 23 MAP 2017 Appeal from the Order of the Commonwealth Court at No. 265 MD 2009 dated December 1, 2016. Appeal from the Commonwealth Court Order dated April 26, 2017 at No. 265 MD 2009. ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 23rd day of August, 2017, oral argument is GRANTED, LIMITED to the following issue raised in the appeal docketed at 126 MAP 2016, as phrased by appellant: “Was the award of $1.6 million in ‘non-economic damages’ proper where the Whistleblower Law does not permit such damages and where the amount of non-economic damages awarded was arbitrary, excessive, and lacking in any rational basis in the record?” The Commonwealth Court’s order is AFFIRMED in all other respects. appeal and ancillary petition at 23 MAP 2017 are DISMISSED as MOOT. [126 MAP 2016; 23 MAP 2017] - 2 The

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.