City of Pgh et al. v. WCAB (Marinack) (summary disposition)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT CITY OF PITTSBURGH AND UPMC BENEFIT MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., Petitioners v. WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (MARINACK), Respondent : : : : : : : : : : : : : : No. 100 WAL 2012 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Published Opinion and Order of the Commonwealth Court at No. 100 CD 2011, at 37 A.3d 39 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2012) filed February 7, 2012, affirming the Order of the Workers' Compensation Appeal Board at No. A09-2326 filed December 21, 2010 ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 9th day of December, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, the order of the Commonwealth Court is VACATED, and the matter is remanded for reconsideration in light of City of Pittsburgh and UPMC Benefit Management Services, Inc. v. Workers Compensation Appeal Board (Robinson), 67 A.3d 1194 (Pa. 2013). Judgment Entered 12/9/2013 _________________________ DEPUTY PROTHONOTARY

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.