Anna Pennacchio, et al, RESP. v. Samuel M. Snipes, et al, PETS (Per Curiam Order)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT ANNA PENNACCHIO AND DANIEL PENNACCHIO, Respondents v. SAMUEL M. SNIPES, BARBARA T. SNIPES, BRADSHAW SNIPES, AND INGEBORG L. SNIPES T/A SNIPES FARM & NURSERY, A PARTNERSHIP, Petitioners : No. 689 M.D. Allocatur Docket 1999 : : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the : Superior Court : : : : : : : : : : ORDER PER CURIAM: AND NOW, this 29th day of September, 1999, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, and the order of the Superior Court is MODIFIED to provide as follows: The order of the trial court granting summary judgment based upon the claim of immunity pursuant to the Recreation Use of Land and Water Act, 68 P.S. §§477-1, et seq., is REVERSED, and the matter remanded to the trial court for consideration of the additional ground for relief asserted in Defendants motion for summary judgment, namely, the claim to immunity pursuant to the Agricultural Immunity Act, 42 Pa.C.S. §8339. Jurisdiction is relinquished.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
