Rudig v. Clackamas County Assessor
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE OREGON TAX COURT MAGISTRATE DIVISION Property Tax JAMES D. RUDIG, Plaintiff, v. CLACKAMAS COUNTY ASSESSOR, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) TC-MD 170306G FINAL DECISION OF DISMISSAL1 Plaintiff appealed Defendant’s addition of omitted property value to Account Number 00318374 (subject property) for the 2014–15 to 2016–17 assessment and tax rolls. Defendant requested full access to the subject property for an inspection, which Plaintiff refused. The court granted Defendant’s ensuing motion to compel in its Order Compelling Full Inspection of Property, incorporated herein by reference. Thirteen days later, Plaintiff filed a letter withdrawing his Complaint. Now, therefore, IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that Plaintiff’s Complaint is dismissed. Dated this day of February, 2018 POUL F. LUNDGREN MAGISTRATE If you want to appeal this Final Decision of Dismissal, file a complaint in the Regular Division of the Oregon Tax Court, by mailing to: 1163 State Street, Salem, OR 97301-2563; or by hand delivery to: Fourth Floor, 1241 State Street, Salem, OR. Your complaint must be submitted within 60 days after the date of the Final Decision of Dismissal or this Final Decision of Dismissal cannot be changed. TCR-MD 19 B. This document was signed by Magistrate Poul F. Lundgren and entered on February 6, 2018. 1 This Final Decision of Dismissal incorporates without change the court’s Decision of Dismissal, entered January 19, 2018. The court did not receive a statement of costs and disbursements within 14 days after its Decision of Dismissal was entered. See Tax Court Rule–Magistrate Division (TCR–MD) 16 C(1). FINAL DECISION OF DISMISSAL TC-MD 170306G 1
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
