Lee v. Dept. of Rev.

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE OREGON TAX COURT MAGISTRATE DIVISION Income Tax BYUNG-CHAN LEE and EUN-KYUNG LEE, Plaintiffs, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) TC-MD 140417D FINAL DECISION This Final Decision incorporates without change the court’s Decision entered December 2, 2014. The court did not receive a request for an award of costs and disbursements within 14 days after its Decision was entered. See TCR-MD 19. This matter is before the court on Defendant’s Answer filed November 26, 2014. Plaintiffs filed their Complaint on November 5, 2014, appealing Defendant’s Notice of Proposed Adjustment and/or Distribution dated August 25, 2014 (Notice). In its Notice, Defendant had disallowed a $36,535 medical and dental expense deduction claimed by Plaintiffs on their 2012 amended return. In its Answer, Defendant stated that it had no disagreement with Plaintiffs and agreed “to restore the $36,535 of medical and dental expenses on Plaintiffs’ 2012 return.” Because the parties are in agreement, the case is ready for decision. Now, therefore, /// /// /// /// /// FINAL DECISION TC-MD 140417D 1 IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that Plaintiffs’ appeal is granted. Defendant shall cancel its Notice of Proposed Adjustment and/or Distribution dated August 25, 2014. Dated this day of December 2014. JILL A. TANNER PRESIDING MAGISTRATE If you want to appeal this Final Decision, file a Complaint in the Regular Division of the Oregon Tax Court, by mailing to: 1163 State Street, Salem, OR 97301-2563; or by hand delivery to: Fourth Floor, 1241 State Street, Salem, OR. Your Complaint must be submitted within 60 days after the date of the Final Decision or this Final Decision cannot be changed. This document was signed by Presiding Magistrate Jill A. Tanner on December 19, 2014. The court filed and entered this document on December 19, 2014. FINAL DECISION TC-MD 140417D 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.