Horton v. Department of Revenue
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE OREGON TAX COURT MAGISTRATE DIVISION Income Tax DEBORAH A. HORTON, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) TC-MD 111266C DECISION OF DISMISSAL This matter is before the court on its own motion to dismiss this case for lack of prosecution. A case management conference was scheduled at 3:00 p.m. on April 24, 2012, to consider Plaintiff s appeal. On April 9, 2012, the court sent notice of the scheduled case management conference to Plaintiff at 1622 SW G Street, Grants Pass, OR 97526, which is the address Plaintiff provided to the court. The notice was not returned as undeliverable. The notice advised that if Plaintiff did not appear, the court might dismiss the appeal. On April 24, 2012, the court sent Plaintiff a letter which explained the importance of diligently pursuing an appeal. That letter was not returned as undeliverable. The letter advised that if Plaintiff did not provide a written explanation by May 8, 2012, for her failure to appear, the court would dismiss the appeal. As of this date, Plaintiff has not submitted a written response to the court explaining her failure to appear at the April 24, 2012, case management conference. Under such circumstances, the court finds the appeal must be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Now, therefore, /// /// DECISION OF DISMISSAL TC-MD 111266C 1 IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that the Complaint is dismissed. Dated this day of May 2012. JILL A. TANNER PRESIDING MAGISTRATE If you want to appeal this Decision, file a Complaint in the Regular Division of the Oregon Tax Court, by mailing to: 1163 State Street, Salem, OR 97301-2563; or by hand delivery to: Fourth Floor, 1241 State Street, Salem, OR. Your Complaint must be submitted within 60 days after the date of the Decision or this Decision becomes final and cannot be changed. This document was signed by Presiding Magistrate Jill A. Tanner on May 16, 2012. The Court filed and entered this document on May 16, 2012. DECISION OF DISMISSAL TC-MD 111266C 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
