Bianca v. Jackson Co.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE OREGON TAX COURT MAGISTRATE DIVISION Property Tax MICHAEL BIANCA, Plaintiff, v. JACKSON COUNTY ASSESSOR, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) TC-MD 021242B DECISION OF STIPULATION This matter is before the court upon the oral stipulation of the parties made during the case management conference held February 28, 2003. Because the parties are in agreement, the case is ready for decision. Now, therefore, IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that the modified amount of assessed value (AV) increases, as set forth in Defendant s Notice of Tax Roll Correction letter dated September 3, 2002, of the property described as Account 1-011002-4 were, as stipulated: Tax Year AV Increase 1997-98 $25,000 1998-99 $25,750 1999-2000 $26,522 2000-2001 $27,318 2001-02 $28,138 /// /// /// /// /// DECISION OF STIPULATION TC-MD 021242B 1 IT IS FURTHER DECIDED that Defendant shall correct the assessment and tax rolls to reflect the above value changes. Any recalculation in taxes due by November 15, 2003 shall be promptly provided by Defendant. Dated this ____ day of March, 2003. ____________________________ JEFF MATTSON MAGISTRATE IF YOU WANT TO APPEAL THIS DECISION, FILE A COMPLAINT IN THE REGULAR DIVISION OF THE OREGON TAX COURT, FOURTH FLOOR, 1241 STATE ST., SALEM, OR 97301-2563. YOUR COMPLAINT MUST BE SUBMITTED WITHIN 60 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF THE DECISION OR THIS DECISION BECOMES FINAL AND CANNOT BE CHANGED. THIS DOCUMENT WAS SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JEFF MATTSON ON MARCH 24, 2003. THE COURT FILED THIS DOCUMENT ON MARCH 24, 2003. DECISION OF STIPULATION TC-MD 021242B 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
