Robertson v. DOR
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE MAGISTRATE DIVISION OF THE OREGON TAX COURT Income Tax APRIL C. AND SCOTT H. ROBERTSON, Plaintiffs, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, STATE OF OREGON, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 001037F DECISION OF DISMISSAL This matter is before the court on its own motion to dismiss plaintiffs' Complaint for failure to pay the statutory filing fee. The court received from plaintiffs an appeal without the required filing fee. The court sent plaintiffs a letter on September 11, 2000, requesting that the fee be paid. The letter advised plaintiffs that if the fee was not paid, the court would dismiss the case. The court has yet to receive the filing fee. Therefore, the court concludes that plaintiffs' appeal should be dismissed. Now, therefore; IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that the Complaint in the aboveentitled matter be dismissed. Dated this _____ day of October, 2000. _________________________________ SALLY L. KIMSEY MAGISTRATE IF YOU BELIEVE YOU HAVE A GOOD REASON WHY THIS DECISION SHOULD BE SET ASIDE, YOU MUST PAY THE $25 FILING FEE AND REQUEST THAT YOUR APPEAL BE REINSTATED. YOUR REQUEST MUST GIVE A GOOD REASON FOR YOUR FAILURE TO PAY THE FEE EARLIER AND MUST BE SUBMITTED WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF THE DECISION OR THIS DECISION BECOMES FINAL AND CANNOT BE CHANGED. THIS DOCUMENT WAS SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE SALLY L. KIMSEY ON DECISION OF DISMISSAL 1 OCTOBER 11, 2000. THE COURT FILED THIS DOCUMENT ON OCTOBER 11, 2000. DECISION OF DISMISSAL 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
