In re Werdell

Annotate this Case

FILED: May 25, 2006

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON

In re Complaint as to the Conduct of

LEE S. WERDELL,

Accused.

(OSB 02-130; SC S51668)

On review of the decision of a trial panel of the Disciplinary Board.

Argued and submitted March 8, 2005.

Lee S. Werdell, in propia persona, Medford, argued the cause and filed the brief for himself.

Jane E. Angus, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, Lake Oswego, argued the cause and filed the brief for the Oregon State Bar. With her on the brief was Louis L. Kurtz, Bar Counsel, Eugene.

Before Carson,* Chief Justice, and Gillette, Durham, Riggs, De Muniz,** Balmer, and Kistler, Justices.

PER CURIAM

The complaint is dismissed.

*Chief Justice when case was argued.

**Chief Justice when decision was rendered.

PER CURIAM

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.