Dept. of Human Services v. A. V.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
No. 29 January 12, 2022 67 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON In the Matter of D. I. B., a Child. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner-Respondent, v. A. V., Appellant. Washington County Circuit Court 20JU04133; A176375 (Control) In the Matter of E. L. B., a Child. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner-Respondent, v. A. V., Appellant. Washington County Circuit Court 20JU04134; A176376 In the Matter of A. J. B., a Child. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner-Respondent, v. A. V., Appellant. Washington County Circuit Court 20JU04135; A176377 Erik M. Buchér, Judge. Submitted December 7, 2021. G. Aron Perez-Selsky and Michael J. Wallace filed the brief for appellant. 68 Dept. of Human Services v. A. V. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Inge D. Wells, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and Shorr, Judge, and Powers, Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. Cite as 317 Or App 67 (2022) 69 PER CURIAM Father appeals the termination of his parental rights to his three children on the basis of unfitness. ORS 419B.504. He concedes that he is presently unfit, but contends that DHS failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that the children could not be reintegrated into his home within a reasonable time. Having reviewed the matter de novo, ORS 19.415(3), we conclude that the condition that renders father unfit is not likely to change within a time that is reasonable considering the children’s emotional and developmental needs. A further written discussion would not benefit the bench or bar. Affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
