Hejazi v. Eugene Police Dept.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

620 September 15, 2021 No. 687 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON HAMID MICHAEL HEJAZI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EUGENE POLICE DEPARTMENT, Lane County Sheriff’s Office, City of Eugene, and Lane County, Defendants. Lane County Circuit Court 20AD0013; A175344 R. Curtis Conover, Judge. Submitted August 6, 2021. Hamid Michael Hejazi filed the brief pro se. Before Lagesen, Presiding Judge, and James, Judge, and Kamins, Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. Cite as 314 Or App 620 (2021) 621 PER CURIAM As allowed under ORS 19.205(2), and explained in Stanwood v. Multnomah County, 135 Or App 58, 60, 898 P2d 196 (1995), plaintiff appeals an order denying his request for a waiver or deferral of filing fees and sheriff’s service fees. Plaintiff’s opening brief, however, contains no argument, and we affirm for that reason. See Smith v. Dept. of Corrections (A170818), 314 Or App 1, ___ P3d ___ (2021) (affirming denial of fee waiver where the appellant’s brief contained no pertinent argument). Affirmed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.