State v. Rosas-Cabildo
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
476 September 9, 2021 No. 659 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ODILON ROSAS-CABILDO, Defendant-Appellant. Washington County Circuit Court 18CR10908; A171705 Oscar Garcia, Judge. Submitted July 23, 2021. Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Mary M. Reese, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Philip Thoennes, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before James, Presiding Judge, and Kamins, Judge, and Kistler, Senior Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. Cite as 314 Or App 476 (2021) 477 PER CURIAM Defendant challenges his convictions for multiple sexual offenses, raising three assignments of error. We affirm. On defendant’s first assignment of error, we are not persuaded that the trial court plainly erred by failing to sua sponte enter a judgment of acquittal on a count of firstdegree sexual abuse. Defendant’s second and third assignments of error challenge the trial court’s nonunanimous instruction to the jury. However, because the verdict was unanimous, defendant’s arguments are foreclosed by State v. Flores Ramos, 367 Or 292, 478 P3d 515 (2020), and State v. Kincheloe, 367 Or 335, 478 P3d 507 (2020), cert den, ___ US ___, ___ S Ct ___, ___ L Ed 2d ___, No. 20-8126, 2021 WL 2519403 (June 21, 2021). Affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
